May be a mean sounding question, but I’m genuinely wondering why people would choose Arch/Endevour/whatever (NOT on steam hardware) over another all-in-one distro related to Fedora or Ubuntu. Is it shown that there are significant performance benefits to installing daemons and utilities à la carte? Is there something else I’m missing? Is it because arch users are enthusiasts that enjoy trying to optimize their system?

  • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Everything I wanted to say in a single comment.
    It really just werks™

    • VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      With how much talk of breaking your install goes around, I assumed it would be a challenge. I run pacman -Syu almost every time I update lmao.

      • Attacker94@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        On occasion I have broken it to the point that I needed to chroot from live USB, but I just chroot and sudo pacman -Syu a couple of hours later and everything sorts itself out. And even if that sounds like a hassle, I can tell you every issue was hardware, I was running endeavor on a USB (not a live env) which is not something I would recommend, because pacman degrades flash memory integrity very quickly, and the only other times I broke it badly enough had to do with nvidia drivers