A 13-year-old student was expelled from a Louisiana middle school after hitting a male classmate who she said created and shared a deepfake pornographic image of her, according to her family’s lawyers.

  • joshikyou@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    52
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I hope you’re not implying that AI generated videos of minors is anywhere near as bad as actual children getting raped.

    • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Imagine creating an account just to go and try to make the argument that some depictions of child pornogrophy isn’t as bad as children being raped. Because you feel the need to compare and rank them, why exactly?

      I don’t know if you’re serious or think you’re being some edgy troll. Regardless. Please go to the nearest mirror and ask yourself if this truly is the best version of yourself.

    • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Hey guy, YOU don’t get to make explicit videos/pictures of whatever weird shit you want if it involves another person.

      This involved a real little girl who now knows for a fact that there’s a little boy who sees her boundaries as non-existent and just uses her body however the fuck he wants with no regard to her feelings.

      Get all the way fucked. I wish she beat his ass for this.

      • Noxy@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Exactly. Even if this was two adults it’d still be incredibly fucked up and wrong and, if in a workplace, should be a slam dunk win in a lawsuit

    • Kcs8v6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You are bullding a straw man so you can knock it down. Quit minimizing the harm done by creating sexually explicit images of a minor.

      • joshikyou@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        33
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Not really. He’s the one who said “child porn,” which most people would assume to mean children being raped and recorded.

        If he’s trying to argue that “making sexually explicit AI videos of minors” deserves a violent response, then he is incorrect and he knows it.

        That’s why he tried to conflate the two.

        • khannie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It’s porn.

          She’s a child.

          It’s child porn.

          Her first response wasn’t violence. She was let down badly by the school then pushed and pushed until she hit him.

        • BussyCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 hours ago

          A person putting a hidden camera in a child’s bathroom to get videos of them naked is also child porn and they also deserve violence upon them.

          Making sexually explicit AI videos of minors absolutely deserves violence

          If the article instead said the girls father who happens to be Mike Tyson punched the 13 year old boy so hard he had brain damage I could see an argument for that possibly being excessive.

          With an emphasis on “possibly”

          You are either uninformed or callous to the amount of damage that those videos can have to a 13yr old girl.

          But the actions that boy took likely permanently altered that girls life for the worse including a significantly higher chance of suicide

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          If he’s trying to argue that “making sexually explicit AI videos of minors” deserves a violent response, then he is incorrect and he knows it.

          That was what was stated and also seems to be agreed is the correct response to child porn sorry “sexualy explicit AI videos of minors”.

    • AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Where the hell did they say anything about child rape? Do you think child porn is only porn when someone is getting raped you absolute disgusting trogoladyte? I refuse to downplay child porn no matter how it’s created. Especially in this case in which the porn was used to torture the girl it was made of.

      The police are charging the young man and don’t expect to do anything to the girl which is an example of people in the real world treating the situation appropriately. I can’t imagine the fucking idiot who didn’t let that girl contact her parents and instead put her in a situation where she COULD have a physical altercation with the abuser on the same bus.

      Thankfully the police are operating responsibly in this case, generally in the US we don’t even expect that.

      • joshikyou@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        7 hours ago

        He shouldn’t be trying to conflate the two and should be specific about his argument if he doesn’t want me to poke holes in it.

        • ysjet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I’m poking holes in his argument heehee!

          These are real fucking people. Get some empathy.

        • AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          You didn’t poke holes, you made something up out of whole cloth. The thing you made was a big red flag on top of your head. Cause we’re all looking sideways at you right now.

          Like how if someone knows way too much about Romeo and Juliette laws, or the age of consent. You are telling on yourself with the logical line of your arguments and I assume you don’t know how to stop that from leaking out.