• Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    Is there a caveat? These reports have a habit of being too good to be true.

    What was that one about the city that successfully ran 100% renewables? It was only for 24 hours, and couldn’t practically be sustained.

    I’m keen for the replacement of fossil fuels, but as much as people suggest it’s lobbying that prevents it, I think there are just some technology gaps that need solving.

      • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Batteries are still less energy dense and portable than fossil fuels. I think this is easily navigated for private use - provide a wide charging infrastructure - but heavy industry is the harder problem to solve, but to match how fossil fuels are used and to change the opinions and expectations of those in charge.

        A lot of remote sites rely on diesel or petrol generators, and I don’t think there’s an equivalent device to provide clean energy in both capacity and portability. I believe the only way to change industrial clean energy adoption is to make clean energy cheaper. Politicians won’t tax fossil fuels (because it’s political suicide in most economies), so we need more emerging technologies before we can get close to actual industry adoption.

            • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              19 days ago

              The repeated calls over the last 50 years show we haven’t been defensive enough.

              But there is hope! One day, someone might succeed in loading a battery in a trailer! Who knows!