• A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    The numbers show that the problem is not with the packaging but with the supermarket shelves. The proximity of meat and plant-based alternatives leads to confusion; simply banning names would likely have little impact.

    This coincides with a pet peeve of mine: strategical supermarket shelving. When in previous decades there were separate sections for different types of produce, these are now mixed in thematically somehow. So, as an example, before there was refrigerated vegan products in one section, sausage/meat products in another, now there’s a section for “things to put on bread”.
    Before there was an organic section, now organic food is mixed in with “normal” food and you have to look for a label.

    This is no doubt to make customers buy more, but I fail to see how exactly. It just pisses me off. I might spend more time in the shop because of that but not more money.
    I have practiced economical shopping, comparing prices and ingredients, for decades. I am not changing my habits.

    They also want me to bend down more often - but that’s OK.

    Many see this as a sideshow. According to hundreds of open-text responses, many consumers view the name debate as unnecessary or just “symbolic politics.” The majority prefer to see a focus on more urgent societal issues.

    A certain type of voter gets riled up very nicely when you even suggest that eating less meat is an option. Therefore it’s specifically right-wing populist Symbolpolitik.