(copied the lead on yesterday’s comment)

This agreement spans a decade BTW, not next year’s paycheck, $90,000,000/yr. Obscene? Yes, but here’s the rub…

The full compensation would only be delivered if Musk vaults the company from its present value of $1.1 trillion to $8.5 trillion…

You’ve got to be fucking kidding me. Is that an actual expectation or is it, “Fuck him, won’t have to pay.”?

“Tell you what Elon, push the company to the most valuable of all time and by a monstrous margin, we’ll pay ya. 10 years buddy! You’re on the clock!”

Even NVIDIA, the most wildly overvalued company in history is “only” at 5-trillion, and that’s a bubble. I know it. You know it. They know it.

The compensation package also includes a set of production goals, including one million Robotaxis in commercial operation and the delivery of one million humanoid robots over the next 10 years, according to the securities filing.

One million Robotaxies?! A cursory Google search shows Waymo with a paltry 2,000 in operation. Another quick search shows 393,400 taxi and shuttle drivers in the entire United States. I know, there’s a whole 'nother world out there, but Europe is not going for Elon’s death traps. Other countries? Dunno. Also note, that’s one million in operation, not parked at your local mall like excess Cybertrucks.

One million humanoid robots?! And who is going to be buying these and for what purpose? Sure, some rich people will get a few on a lark, just a toy, but no way these things become cheap and useful enough for mass deployment in a decade. Again, sold and delivered, not merely manufactured.

In my opinion, the AI bubble is going to pop and we’ll be in worse shape than the Great Depression, at best this will be the worst economy any of us have ever lived. (Look up the “Buffett Index”.) Who is going to be paying taxi fares and buying robots?! With what money?

That’s just three of the goals he must meet, who knows what else is in there. Bet there are clauses concerning TSLA stock price, another bubble. Knowing his track record on delivery, think any of this pans out? It’s almost like the board is making fun of him. “You go genius boy! We know you can do it!”

So yeah, if he manages to hit these terms in a decade, he deserves $1T, no shit. Anybody want to give me a cool trillion if I can manage to eat a whole skyscraper in the next decade?

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The CEO is paid out a % according to the preformance of the company, thats fair. However elon is also a major shareholder and has a vested interest in the value increasing.

    This is not him negotiating a fair pay structure for set goals this is him holding the investors at gun point saying you must promise me a greater than normal share of the profit or this or this entire house of cards falls.

    What he is promising is not realistic and everyone knows this which is why he is doing this in the way he is.

    • golli@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      That’s my main problem as well. He is also constantly in a conflict of interest with his other companies, particularly xAI.

      If Tesla were to ever reach those insane valuations, they’d have to succeed (and dominate) in fields like self driving, robotics/automation and ai. Fields that xAI is also pursuing or could possibly expand into.

      Elon has a stake in Tesla, but he holds more percentage wise in xAI and even increased his stake there when he made them buy X for an imo very unrealistic valuation. It’s exactly like you say, he is and will continue to pit these companies against each other (and maybe start new ones) to increase his share.

      I think he’s also exploiting that somehow a lot of the valuation still seems to hang on him, although particularly in the case of Tesla I don’t know what he has done for the company in recent years (if he’d have developed xAI inside the company we could maybe talk, but he purposely did that outside because he wanted more ownership stake).

      Berkshire Hathaway would kind of be the antithesis to this I think. If I understand it correctly they barely pay their directors, but instead they simply hold quite a bit of shares, so doing well for the company also benefits them.

    • shalafi@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      You kinda lost me. I’m saying the terms of the contract are absolutely impossible to fulfill.