• Best_Jeanist@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    That’s an optimistic point of view. I think world war 3 is far more likely. Trump has been testing the waters internationally with the talk about invading Greenland. He wants to invade Poland, if you know what I mean.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s an optimistic point of view

      It absolutely isn’t. Civil war is kind of a bad thing. Assuming ww3 is a reality is a particularly pessimistic pov

      • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Pretty sure a US civil war would bring in a bunch of other countries at this stage. Possibly more like Europe before WW2, since a civil war here seems likely to smart with an invasion of red state national guard in a blue state, then California/cascadia fighting back maybe?

        And Russia or China would potentially be helping the right, or at least stirring the pot to make it worse for us all. They might help fund the obvious loser to keep it going and more permanently damage the country. China would want to wreak California to finish off the Tech oligarchs so they can dominate that I’d assume.

        Then would Europe come help out blue states, they seem happy with Mamdai’s win and policies, but probably wouldn’t want to be a part of it until MAGA or its allies attack them (like Pearl Harbor). Canada would have to join the blue states pretty early on or they wouldn’t last long.

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      civil war in the usa will be needed… it does not cancel wwiii

      the are not mutually exclusive options