• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 days ago

    See the problem there is that it doesn’t scale. You can only take down so many cameras.

    Now if you convince the local scrappers that the things are full of copper…

    • tornavish@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well, don’t sell yourself short—one camera per person destroys them all. It’s gotta start somewhere.

      I’m sure those cameras would probably resell somewhere. Sell them back to flock 🙃

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        As I was driving around today, I was thinking how an organized trend to destroy or disable them would make them economically inefficient very quickly.

        I’m no maniac driver, but I hate having to drive around paranoid that I’m going to get a ticket for going 5 mph too fast.

        • tornavish@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Well, those might not even be flock camera! But they definitely scan your plate and keep that data forever.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sure. If all you can do is steal one camera, then steal one camera.

        But…

        Steal one camera, stop surveillance for a day. But teach a cracky to steal cameras for cash, stop surveillance for a generation.

    • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      “Genious Gray Hat creates open-source software to repurpose second-hand flock cameras for personal use; Flock cameras start flooding Craigslist and eBay”