• Scubus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Not who you responded to, but evidently someone needs to point out that you didnt read their question, or you maliciously misinterpreted it.

    Edit: nope they did actually answer the question, im just shockingly bad at reading which is very unusual for me.

      • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        …so you’re just ignoring their question to substitute your own. Very nice strawman, but it does appear pretty malicious at this point.

          • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Nah m8, you right. Somehow repeatedly missed your last statement. Sorry for the snarkiness.

            I saw the “almost every sex offender is a man” part, but i missed you actually answering the question somehow. Genuinely sorry

            Edit:seriously thats wild, im guessing i got hit with a serious case of assuming