• ragepaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      I’m not sure why you’re arguing. YOU linked to the article I responded to. Did you actually read it? And did you notice that the article now redirects to a different article than the one you linked to?

      It really wasn’t hard to find a different source that for the same article you originally posted. Many other sites reposted.

      https://sffgazette.com/sci_fi/star-trek/star-trek-4-has-finally-been-scrapped-as-paramount-moves-on-from-chris-pine-led-franchise-a9354

      Note: “SOURCE: VARIETY”

      • James R Kirk@startrek.websiteOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The article I shared is the original source and does not contain a mention of prequels.

        The link you shared just now appears to be an AI slop summary with added hallucinations.

        I am arguing with you because from the perspective of someone reading the article I shared, you brought up an entirely unrelated topic in order to complain.

        • ragepaw@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          The title of the article you posted is clearly not the same article given that it’s not the same headline or the fact it’s not even about Star Trek.

          You’re clearly a troll, and I’m done wasting time with you.

          • James R Kirk@startrek.websiteOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            The article that you are commenting underneath is the original source for the quote about Star Trek and does not contain any mention of prequels.