The smart vacuum cleaner was remotely bricked for not collecting data.

  • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    178
    ·
    4 days ago

    Having someone use a remote kill command for an item you bought for reasons other than imminent threats to safety ought to be illegal. This shouldn’t be treated differently from a car salesman bricking your windshield after you drive off the lot.

      • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Is it still sabotage if the only thing they have sold is a license to use their product not the product itself. That is still their property.

        • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I’m no law expert, but as far as i know, there were already similiar cases. Reasoning (german law): Software required to run the product is not “licensed to use” but part of the product, which was bought, belongs the user and not the company. Remotely making the device unusable would indeed violate that term.

        • Natanael@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          At least in EU the manufacturer can’t revoke licenses on sold physical products with no cause (can’t expire before EOL either) and can’t remove advertised functionality. If any feature is conditional or temporary it has to be disclosed before sale.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The issue you’ll run into is that the data runs through their servers, and you ages to let them kill it off. Should that be legal? I honestly don’t know. But they shouldn’t force you to use their servers to begin with, which would make the entire issue moot.