Kinda shocked that after all the recent info coming out he thinks that it’s not going to be a “climate disaster” lmao. Headline is deliberately misleading but that doesn’t make bill less of an idiot.
It’s charity done by following certain principles. Nothing about it is tied to being wealthy, though that obviously helps as is the case with charity in general.
Which part makes no sense? You don’t believe that climate spending needs to be considered in terms of overall human welfare? Or you believe that statement doesn’t make sense to you? Or…
Ask me how I know you only read the headline.
The headline is deliberately misleading and honestly should be corrected or removed.
Please put in slightly more effort next time, thanks.
Kinda shocked that after all the recent info coming out he thinks that it’s not going to be a “climate disaster” lmao. Headline is deliberately misleading but that doesn’t make bill less of an idiot.
The problem with “effective altruism” ideology, it’s dependent on the whims of the wealthy.
By what logic? Can’t normal people donate money to effective causes?
Sure, but effective altruism is a specific ideology. Not just donating to causes.
It’s charity done by following certain principles. Nothing about it is tied to being wealthy, though that obviously helps as is the case with charity in general.
We read more than the headline. His argument makes no sense at all. Please do yourself the fabour of putting more effort into your replies.
Which part makes no sense? You don’t believe that climate spending needs to be considered in terms of overall human welfare? Or you believe that statement doesn’t make sense to you? Or…