• balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    We’re also talking about five year olds walking 1-2 mi at the end of a long day. Older kids, fine, but 5 is pretty young. I don’t think my parents were comfortable with me walking/biking home alone until 4th grade.

    There’s also plenty of other valid use cases, such as if you are taking your kid to something after school. Or they have an activity which causes them to stay late. Or you don’t want them to take the bus cause you’re already in the neighborhood and why not pick them up as a treat (when I was growing up, buses didn’t have a/c - riding in anything that didn’t have a bunch of smelly sweating kids was definitely a treat)

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Even if they’re within walking range only 25% of kids walk. 50% are driven by private car, and 25% take the bus. So you literally have 50% of kids that are within walking range still getting dropped off/picked up by private vehicle.

      For your other use cases, that’s why other countries use public transit rather than publicly funded school buses that only run twice a day. It’s just a massive waste of money.

      https://www.bts.gov/topics/passenger-travel/back-school-2019

      • balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Well that’s fun data. The very bottom of the page links to the raw dataset.

        This country also uses public buses in some areas. Where I grew up the school board staggered starts so the school busses are used most of the day.

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Yeah the truth of the matter is, people use cars because they have them. If they didn’t have them things would be a lot different. You can see that by looking at the data on that link as well. 70% of impoverished children ride the school bus. So not only are those kids disadvantaged with money, but they’re disadvantaged with the situations you’re talking about with after school activities as well. Public transit would be better for everyone here. We wouldn’t be funding these school buses that might ride empty, taxpayer dollars would be able to be reallocated to the actual teaching in the school or even better public transit. A small portion of that would go to the impoverished or those that can’t take public transit.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      2 miles would be in the bus zone.

      I don’t know why people are pretending this is impossible, it’s exactly how it worked when I was in public school. In the US.

      Everyone walked or took a bus. Maybe there was like one or two kids who had some sort of special circumstance that required them to get picked up.

      • balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It might just be possible that in a country of 300+ million people spread over 3 million square miles where each school district is operated at a local level…for two people to have had different experiences.

        Either way if your parents thought 5 was old enough to get home from school by yourself, good for you I guess.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          They didn’t, I walked home with a friend who lived nearby and hung out until my mom was done work. Could have taken the bus home, but they didn’t want me home alone at that age.

          Also, it may not seem like it anymore, but we do have a Department of Education that could pretty easily come up with nationwide rules regarding bussing. They could even afford to subsidize it in areas with lower income. Or, you know, not make education quality a function of an area’s wealth in the first place, and just administer it all at the federal (or even just state) level.