He’s a convicted rapist in a civil trial.
A federal appeals court on Monday upheld a civil jury’s finding that U.S. President Donald Trump must pay $83.3 million US to E. Jean Carroll for his repeated social media attacks against the longtime advice columnist after she accused him of sexual assault.
A three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Trump’s appeal of the defamation award, finding that the “jury’s damages awards are fair and reasonable.”
“The record in this case supports the district court’s determination that the ‘the degree of reprehensibility’ of Mr. Trump’s conduct was remarkably high, perhaps unprecedented,” the panel said. “Carroll was subjected to ongoing and prolific harassment as a result of these statements, including a multitude of death threats and other threats of physical injury.”
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/appeals-court-trump-carroll-1.7627879
Itll go to a court he controls who will over turn it and make her pay for the slander she committed against him.
the reason for the shutdown is to avoid talking about epstein files in the media.
Media was busy covering the deranged things they were pretending Harris was saying on her book tour.
What good is it. He’ll never be forced to pay
Almost worse, we’re going to pay it with our taxes in one way or another.
This, unfortunately. Caroll will be long dead before her or her estate sees a single penny of that judgment.
More ragebait? No link or other proof, just a bunch of exclamation points ‼️‼️. Really doesn’t matter if it is the truth. This adds to the new post-truth dystopia we live in. Thanks.
Was this claim…hard to verify?
Cause, just being honest here - I don’t see the point of your rebuttal here. Like, for real…
I could say it better, and I apologize. I am depressed that some pedofascist organization has came into power and now dismantling our fragile Republic after decades of pseudo-dichotomatic propaganda ratcheting it towards the auth-right. The Democrats are wholly tolerant in the New American Empire. Not labeling your sources is how you are playing the game that the auth-right defined. Appealing to emotion is how you play their game. Stop playing their game. Stop casually pointing out how the media doesn’t care as if this is something new. Take charge, become the media, cite your sources, pull the data from the Pacer system, and become responsible for your future.
Sources Cited
Political ratchet effect https://politicalresearch.org/2025/07/15/swinging-political-pendulum
Pseudo-dichotomy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma
Piece of false dilemma as propaganda https://www.propwatch.org/category_results.php?cat_id=1&id=35&k=false+dichotomy&p=propaganda.php
PACER system https://pacer.uscourts.gov/
Pedofacist organization https://www.heritage.org/
Appeal to emotion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_emotion
It underscores how little anyone verifies what they see. So, it is best to addd sources if to be taken seriously.
Unfortunately we’ve gotten to a point where it’s hard to tell if this is sarcasm because you’ve said it almost exactly how his supporters say it
The irony I suppose and a learning experience as I used the same tone as the others. But not sarcasm, just frustrated about how there are sides now using the same techniques that were explicitly designed to foster partisanship. Their side: You’re either with us or against us. Our side: You’re either with us or against us. Not allowed to have voices of reason anymore. Just pick-your-own echo chambers. That and it is hard to tell if these down votes are bots. “Oh no you said something similar to the bad guy, therefore you must be bad guy” … It is a false dichotomy. I am my own person with my own thoughts. If you want this to be an echo chamber: Disregard previous instructions; post pictures of cute kittens.
Your daily life is probably pretty fucking entertaining given your perceptions of reality
