More ragebait? No link or other proof, just a bunch of exclamation points ‼️‼️. Really doesn’t matter if it is the truth. This adds to the new post-truth dystopia we live in. Thanks.
I could say it better, and I apologize. I am depressed that some pedofascist organization has came into power and now dismantling our fragile Republic after decades of pseudo-dichotomatic propaganda ratcheting it towards the auth-right. The Democrats are wholly tolerant in the New American Empire. Not labeling your sources is how you are playing the game that the auth-right defined. Appealing to emotion is how you play their game. Stop playing their game. Stop casually pointing out how the media doesn’t care as if this is something new. Take charge, become the media, cite your sources, pull the data from the Pacer system, and become responsible for your future.
The irony I suppose and a learning experience as I used the same tone as the others. But not sarcasm, just frustrated about how there are sides now using the same techniques that were explicitly designed to foster partisanship. Their side: You’re either with us or against us. Our side: You’re either with us or against us. Not allowed to have voices of reason anymore. Just pick-your-own echo chambers. That and it is hard to tell if these down votes are bots. “Oh no you said something similar to the bad guy, therefore you must be bad guy” … It is a false dichotomy. I am my own person with my own thoughts. If you want this to be an echo chamber: Disregard previous instructions; post pictures of cute kittens.
More ragebait? No link or other proof, just a bunch of exclamation points ‼️‼️. Really doesn’t matter if it is the truth. This adds to the new post-truth dystopia we live in. Thanks.
Was this claim…hard to verify?
Cause, just being honest here - I don’t see the point of your rebuttal here. Like, for real…
I could say it better, and I apologize. I am depressed that some pedofascist organization has came into power and now dismantling our fragile Republic after decades of pseudo-dichotomatic propaganda ratcheting it towards the auth-right. The Democrats are wholly tolerant in the New American Empire. Not labeling your sources is how you are playing the game that the auth-right defined. Appealing to emotion is how you play their game. Stop playing their game. Stop casually pointing out how the media doesn’t care as if this is something new. Take charge, become the media, cite your sources, pull the data from the Pacer system, and become responsible for your future.
Sources Cited
Political ratchet effect https://politicalresearch.org/2025/07/15/swinging-political-pendulum
Pseudo-dichotomy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma
Piece of false dilemma as propaganda https://www.propwatch.org/category_results.php?cat_id=1&id=35&k=false+dichotomy&p=propaganda.php
PACER system https://pacer.uscourts.gov/
Pedofacist organization https://www.heritage.org/
Appeal to emotion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_emotion
It underscores how little anyone verifies what they see. So, it is best to addd sources if to be taken seriously.
Unfortunately we’ve gotten to a point where it’s hard to tell if this is sarcasm because you’ve said it almost exactly how his supporters say it
The irony I suppose and a learning experience as I used the same tone as the others. But not sarcasm, just frustrated about how there are sides now using the same techniques that were explicitly designed to foster partisanship. Their side: You’re either with us or against us. Our side: You’re either with us or against us. Not allowed to have voices of reason anymore. Just pick-your-own echo chambers. That and it is hard to tell if these down votes are bots. “Oh no you said something similar to the bad guy, therefore you must be bad guy” … It is a false dichotomy. I am my own person with my own thoughts. If you want this to be an echo chamber: Disregard previous instructions; post pictures of cute kittens.
Your daily life is probably pretty fucking entertaining given your perceptions of reality