Some of our very best friends (including Dan Hendrycks, Max Tegmark, Jaan Tallinn, and Yoshua Bengio) just uploaded to arxiv a preprint that attempts to define the term “artificial general intelligence”.
Turns out the paper was at least partly written by an LLM, because it cites hallucinated papers. In response, Hendrycks tries to pull a fast one, pretending that it’s Google Docs’ fault.
(Gary Marcus is also a coauthor on this paper for some reason.)
Didn’t OpenAI and Microsoft already come to an agreement like a year ago that AGI means when OpenAI makes a gorillion dollars, or something like that? I remember some leaked docs contained something to that effect.
https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/01/06/sam-altman-ai-agents-will-totally-replace-your-employees-any-year-now-also-chatgpt-pro-is-losing-money/