Blaming the fewest number of non-voters in history instead of the worst election fraud in history is lazy thinking.
If you worked in bank, and you knew you had employees who were openly stealing from your bank, would you ignore the theft, and instead blame the customers who aren’t putting enough money in the bank to stay ahead of the embezzlement? “Gee, if we only had more people putting money in the bank, maybe it wouldn’t make any difference how much my dishonest employees steal. It’s the fault of our non-customers who refuse to be part of our openly corrupt system that our bank is failing, not the thieves.”
That’s exactly how Dems have treated the biggest election fraud in American history, yet I’M not holding people accountable?
Blaming the fewest number of non-voters in history instead of the worst election fraud in history is lazy thinking.
If you worked in bank, and you knew you had employees who were openly stealing from your bank, would you ignore the theft, and instead blame the customers who aren’t putting enough money in the bank to stay ahead of the embezzlement? “Gee, if we only had more people putting money in the bank, maybe it wouldn’t make any difference how much my dishonest employees steal. It’s the fault of our non-customers who refuse to be part of our openly corrupt system that our bank is failing, not the thieves.”
That’s exactly how Dems have treated the biggest election fraud in American history, yet I’M not holding people accountable?