• shrugs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Tested it yesterday. Don’t really like it. Don’t get me wrong it looks nice and seems to be kinda polished, but its way to much work to remove all the stupid shit I don’t need. DHH says its for professionals. Arch and Rolling release distro don’t fit with working professionally in my opinion.

    I’m happy if it gets more poeple to try linux but it’s not for me. Debian all the way and despite what DHH said, you can install hyprland on debian (and even ubuntu) no problem. He seems to be kinda a linux noob :)

    • bitofhope@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’ve used rolling distros professionally on my one-man workstation and they’ve been fine. I wouldn’t want it on a server without a regular update schedule, rigorously followed.

      “Polished” is not what I’d call the bits of Omarchy I’ve come across.

    • Reach_the_man@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      been using Arch(EOS) as (mostly casual) daily driver (honestly feels smoother than ubuntu), what should i look out for?

      • bitofhope@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Nothing. You should only look out for things when you notice a need that is not fulfilled by what you’re currently running.

    • froztbyte@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      you type “DHH said” twice in one post like he’s anyone to listen to, amazing

      (pro-tip: he ain’t)