The collapse of the American empire would benefit almost every other country. I am starting to feel that since I live in America I should want to accelerate the collapse (or make sure one happens if things start to go back to business as usual). Can someone tell me why this is a bad idea so that I don’t make a mistake here.

  • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    Collapse doesn’t mean it’s wiped off the map. All the guns and bombs will continue to exist as it becomes more and more of a failed state, there is a real possibility of lashing out and starting WWIII, and in any case the right is much better armed and poised to take advantage of the chaos.

    All else being equal, I believe it’s better if it doesn’t collapse just yet. But we don’t really get to decide that, and regardless of what we want or don’t want, collapse is coming. There will be no return to the status quo, not for long anyway, because people are dissatisfied with it, and the powers that be have demonstrated that they’re unwilling to make any sort of compromise to keep things running if it gets in the way of their looting.

    There’s no real reason to push for collapse since it’s inevitable, it’s better to just prepare for it so that we can best contain the damage.

    • Comrade1917@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Is there a chance that the collapse causes a civil war so that the US will be too busy dealing with that to lash out at other countries? The country is polarized enough that I would think it would just take the right moment to cause that to happen. Other countries could take advantage of the weakness of the US during that time to surpass the US in every field. I feel like if a revolution can not be achieved this would be the best alternative because at least the rest of the world would benefit.

      • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        A civil war would be entirely one-sided bc one side has all the guns. That’s not really a war, it’s a massacre. And nobody’s gonna risk their neck in the first place if it’s a doomed cause.

        There are two scenarios where there’s a fighting chance, first, if the conflict is between the state and the right, and second, if the left becomes armed and organized.

        The material conditions aren’t set for the left to take advantage of chaos and collapse. The first order of business is to set up the correct material conditions.

          • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            I think we need to examine what we’re specifically talking about when we say, “collapse.” The British Empire, the Weimar Republic, and the Qing dynasty all collapsed, but that collapse looked very different in each case.

            • Darkcommie@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              They will exist as a shadow of their former selves no longer able to wage war or terrorise other countries with impunity

                • Darkcommie@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Declining conditions is too vague it can elapse anything from eggs got 0.5 cents more expensive to the economy just collapsed (which would weaken the war machine severely since the army is effectively a money sink with no returns) no in order for the US to collapse it has suffer several defeats at war and forcibly undergo an economic transformation that leaves is more isolated from the world