• clif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      9 days ago

      That was actually one of the reasons I learned. The rich families wanted to show how rich they were so they built towers. Then other rich families built their own, preferably bigger, to show that they had a bigger penis more money.

      Are there any facts to back that up? I don’t know. I heard it ~25 years ago and I don’t remember the source. Though, I was in Bologna around that time so possibly from a tour or possibly from some drunk guy at a party.

      • Eq0@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Take also meant more unstable, so there was a component of an engineering challenge.

        • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 days ago

          Or horse. I wonder what the 12th century equivalent of a modified tailpipe was?

            • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 days ago

              Those are words I’ve never seen, thanks. I guess I can see that, imagine some smelly poor showing up on a nag in a burlap caparison then some medieval influencer on a Percheron with a purple silk caparison pulls up alongside? All the fair maidens faint right there!

    • teft@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s not about height, it’s about girth. You need a properly wide base and taper in order to please house so many soldiers.