Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agoInspirationallemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1382arrow-down18
arrow-up1374arrow-down1imageInspirationallemmy.dbzer0.comStamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-squarezxqwas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23·1 day agoIn a frictionless vaccuum 45° would be max range.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·1 day agoYeah you actually want a bit less then that.
minus-squareOoops@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·edit-223 hours agoUnless you use modern artillery. Then you want to aim even higher because at those ranges/heights it’s beneficial to reach less dense air layers quickly.
In a frictionless vaccuum 45° would be max range.
Yeah you actually want a bit less then that.
Unless you use modern artillery. Then you want to aim even higher because at those ranges/heights it’s beneficial to reach less dense air layers quickly.