• crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m somewhat excited but I’m still going to hold some back until they reveal who this mystery OEM is. I really don’t want to move from one big corporation to another

  • vatlark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It always seemed odd to me that you needed a pixel. I know it’s for reasons but google is an anti-privacy company at it’s core.

    If they can break away from Google I will buy one next.

  • glitching@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    whoever they end up with, it’s gonna be a new model, which means perfectly usable tech from the last 7-8 years is excluded, and it also means it’s gonna be expensive. so good for them, I guess, but this news doesn’t concern me in the slightest.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      In a year or two it will not be new anymore and if the same model will be available with stock android it doesn’t have to be very expensive.

      • glitching@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        my baseline is a 7 year old model with 8 GB RAM and SDM845 that I can get intermittently for $50. for that kinda money I get a LineageOS fully supported device that’s blazing fast, safe and secure against any reasonable threat; I have zero concerns a lost or stolen device will compromise me. as a bonus, it just so happens it’s one of the best supported devices for Mobian and postmarketOS. so, that’s the baseline.

        GrapheneOS value proposition is gonna be spend 10x that (at least!) for a marginally secure-er solution. that’s a shite deal.

        now if they partnered with LineageOS and other “let’s revive old shit left behind” that would be a different story. imagine if Linux was available only on latest gen CPUs, would all of us be into it? I know I wouldn’t be.

    • glitching@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      batteries and hardware (motherboards, cameras, etc) on most phones and laptops are achievably replaceable. not “I’m boarding a plane better change it in my lap” but like half an hour of work, which isn’t that big of a drag every year or so. watch any youtube video tutorial to get a better sense. I’m not saying grams can pull it off, but if you’re even tangentially tech literate, it’s doable.

    • Scoopta@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      That would be nice but I do wonder how much the Graphene project is going to be involved in hardware decisions if it is a major OEM. Sounds like it’ll be more just a phone where the OEM provides support of bootloader unlocks and installation of graphene

  • Scoopta@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Too bad google stopped shipping pixel specific code in the AOSP tree. Maybe they wouldn’t be contemplating dropping the pixel 11 if that was still the case.

  • Turret3857@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Im confused. Graphene has been saying this for at least a couple years. Is there a change now where they’re actually finalizing something?

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      If I read previous articles right, Google has stopped shipping Pixel specific hardware drivers down to the android open source project, so any hardware support graphene figures out going forward has to be reverse engineered anyway.

      So that’s some additional motivation at least.

    • vatlark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sounds like Google is no longer giving security patches as quickly as the used to. I may be wrong.

      • Turret3857@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean we’ve known that for a couple months. I want to know if Graphene is actually close to releasing something or if this is just digging up old quotes where they’re just saying “we’re working with an OEM” like they have been for the past couple years.