I would say, finally, in an era of bitter political struggle even in the free software world, finally we see a good humoured hacker joke again

    • Donaldist@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Well, as far as i have observed this (from safe distance, far, far away…) Andreas Kling rejected a proposal from a new contributor to change documentation to use gender neutral terms… and as usual with those things, people tend to get mad.

      Edit: A simple to the people downvoting: Why?

      • brax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Lmao there’s actually something kind of hilarious about a person trying to push gender neutral terms into documentation for a program called “Ladybird”.

        Did they want the project to be renamed to “Lady/Man/Thembird” too? /S

      • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Kling has promoted the nonsense white replacement conspiracy theory, whined about “leftist activists”.

        The answer is because just a tiny bit of looking at kling - just like with DHH - will reveal so much more far-right attitude and behavior beyond kling rejecting an offer to fix the poorly written documentation.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Kling has promoted the nonsense white replacement conspiracy theory

          This is news to me. I’ll look into them saying that and change how I talk about this event. Because before knowing this I would’ve described it similarly as the other person. But yeah, any grace I was willing to extend goes away if they’re parroting white replacement.

        • Donaldist@feddit.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I am not involved in the Ladybird project, do not really follow the development or the community thereof in any close fashion, so i do not want to take any sides here. What i can say for sure after spending ~ 30 years online is, that the net often amplifies drama beyond any rational measure… so, until i find the time and energy to look into that (unlikely) i will stay with a neutral “oookay…”

          • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            As someone who has been online since the late 80’s (BBS) and early 90’s (internet), I’m well aware of how things can be amplified.

            However, this does not require in-depth review. These are things you can discover with a cursory search that would have taken less time than writing that comment, FYI. I don’t think anyone is sitting here suggesting Kling has grand plans for a gassing center, just that he promotes far right conspiracy theories and other hard-right ideology. This is a simple, easily verifiable statement.

            i will stay with a neutral “oookay….”

            Just so you know, this can come across condescending. I’m not going to say that was your intention, but that is absolutely how it would be read.

            • Donaldist@feddit.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Just so you know, this can come across condescending. I’m not going to say that was your intention, but that is absolutely how it would be read.

              Just to clarify: It is not meant that way, it is meant as an “Okay, i understand what you say but i will take anything i read online with a truckload of salt - no offense”