√𝛂𝛋𝛆@piefed.world to CosplayGirls@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoConsent - no namemedia.piefed.worldimagemessage-square411fedilinkarrow-up1327arrow-down128file-text
arrow-up1299arrow-down1imageConsent - no namemedia.piefed.world√𝛂𝛋𝛆@piefed.world to CosplayGirls@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square411fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareGeneral_Effort@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·1 month agoPants and pockets. For men a combo, for women a choice.
minus-squareObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 month agoDresses dont have pockets either, I’m confused
minus-squareGeneral_Effort@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 month agoMaybe I should have written leg coverings? You get the joke, right? She has lots of pockets but no pants or skirt. I wonder why tactical belts like that are not a popular accessory. It emphasizes the hips, like those tutus that are sometimes in fashion.
minus-squareObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoThis is the first I’m hearing about tactical belts, so that’s probably why. Women don’t buy something traditionally masculine just because it’s pink the way guys do with “tactical” whatnot
Pants and pockets. For men a combo, for women a choice.
Dresses dont have pockets either, I’m confused
Maybe I should have written leg coverings? You get the joke, right? She has lots of pockets but no pants or skirt.
I wonder why tactical belts like that are not a popular accessory. It emphasizes the hips, like those tutus that are sometimes in fashion.
This is the first I’m hearing about tactical belts, so that’s probably why. Women don’t buy something traditionally masculine just because it’s pink the way guys do with “tactical” whatnot
What