• AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    The German constitution would strongly suggest this. It defines the security of Israel as Germany’s primary reason for existing.

    • Sidyctism II.@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      The german costitution doesnt mention israel. I think you are confusing this with conservative verbalizations of the “staatsräson”.

      • magnetosphere@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Please, elaborate. I’m imagining that lots of people (myself included) don’t know a lot about that.

        • Sidyctism II.@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Staatsräson= the reason a state exists, basically.
          When you look for the english version of the wikipedia article it gives you “national interest”, but i dont think they are quite the same. national interest seems to be thrown around far more flippantly in us politics, while staatsräson is invoked only rarely in german politics. For those who do, it refers to a (mostly) unchanging base of the german state. It is however not a part of the constitution or any german law, and can therefore not be enforced.
          Both adenauer (first chancellor of west germany) and merkel named israels safety as part of the staatsräson. After the attack of the 7. october, olaf scholz (chancellor until '24) even called it
          the staatsräson.
          After the recent limitations of weapon exports to israel (falsely called waffenstopp), current chancellor merz commented that it doesnt make a lot of sense to make another nation your staatsräson.