TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website to Star Trek Social Club@startrek.websiteEnglish · 3 days agoIn this dire time ...startrek.websiteimagemessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up198arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up198arrow-down1imageIn this dire time ...startrek.websiteTribblesBestFriend@startrek.website to Star Trek Social Club@startrek.websiteEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square16fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareDasus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·3 days agoAlso, an ad hominem is an attack against the person instead of the argument. If you attack the argument and then the person, that’s not technically an ad hominem.
minus-squarecaseyweederman@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 days agoNo, that would be an and hominem.
minus-squarecaptainlezbian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 days agoExactly. “No because you’re an idiot” is ad hominem, but “no because x, and you’re an idiot for thinking that” is valid albeit rude
Also, an ad hominem is an attack against the person instead of the argument.
If you attack the argument and then the person, that’s not technically an ad hominem.
No, that would be an and hominem.
Exactly. “No because you’re an idiot” is ad hominem, but “no because x, and you’re an idiot for thinking that” is valid albeit rude