They’ve all been doing that for several years now. Ford with the Lightning and Mustang. Mercedes’ AMG. BMW’s M. Cadillac’s V. Dodge Dart being an econo car. They all just love to shit all over their own prestige they’ve built.
AMG has been the high performance division of Mercedes since 1993, after having built race engines since 1967.
BMW M is the same kind of subsidiary, having started in 1976.
Cadillac’s V-series is a high performance designation for those vehicles, tuned by the General Motors Performance division, today referred to as Chevrolet Performance. That division began as General Motors Performance Parts in 1967.
The Dodge Dart is a vehicle nameplate that started in the 1960 model year as a “lower priced full size model” - while being the smallest full size Dodge - then changing to mid size in 1962, then “compact” (for the time) from 1963 to 1976. A great deal of the history of the Dodge Dart is as an economy car. Of course, the 1960s and 70s had V8s available, with the 1968 L023 with a 426 Hemi as a standout, but the slant 6 was the bread and butter of the Dart through its entire early production run.
The Ford F-150 Lightning is a nameplate for the EV F-150 introduced in mid 2021.
At least you were right about the Mustang, though.
The only thing in your list that’s accurate as “shit[ting] all over their own prestige they’ve built” for “the last several years now” is putting the Mustang badge on an electric SUV.
“Lightning” is a brand new badge for Ford; its use is not shitting on anything. Everything else you’ve mentioned has been going on for literal decades and is the source of a fair amount of that prestige, or in the case of the Dodge Dart badge being used on an economy car … that’s what the old Darts already were.
Fair on the 1990s Lightning, and no, I don’t get my automotive history from bad movies.
Cadillac shat on its branding in the 80s with the Cimarron. Mercedes did a bad job with the ML320 in the late 80s. Ford’s malaise era Thunderbird was extra malaisey. BMW has always been kind of hit or miss, they’ve always tried to be closer to the bleeding edge of technology, and that doesn’t always work out. Chrsyler K cars were so famously disposable that you can’t even find them anymore, but none of their cars have really been super reliable since the 70s.
My point still stands. Your understanding of automotive history is bad, and you should feel bad.
Was there a Cimarron V I’m unaware of? ML320 AMG? I’m still not sure what you’re trying to say but whatever it is you’re being an unnecessary giant dick about it so you can get fucked and blocked. You don’t know what you’re talking about.
They’ve all been doing that for several years now. Ford with the Lightning and Mustang. Mercedes’ AMG. BMW’s M. Cadillac’s V. Dodge Dart being an econo car. They all just love to shit all over their own prestige they’ve built.
Ford named a truck Maverick, too.
The Ford Maverick car was kind of a cool-looking car in the late 70s. But they turned it into the most generic vehicle possible.
I could probably go on for a while if I tried. Ford seems to be exceptionally bad.
AMG has been the high performance division of Mercedes since 1993, after having built race engines since 1967.
BMW M is the same kind of subsidiary, having started in 1976.
Cadillac’s V-series is a high performance designation for those vehicles, tuned by the General Motors Performance division, today referred to as Chevrolet Performance. That division began as General Motors Performance Parts in 1967.
The Dodge Dart is a vehicle nameplate that started in the 1960 model year as a “lower priced full size model” - while being the smallest full size Dodge - then changing to mid size in 1962, then “compact” (for the time) from 1963 to 1976. A great deal of the history of the Dodge Dart is as an economy car. Of course, the 1960s and 70s had V8s available, with the 1968 L023 with a 426 Hemi as a standout, but the slant 6 was the bread and butter of the Dart through its entire early production run.
The Ford F-150 Lightning is a nameplate for the EV F-150 introduced in mid 2021.
At least you were right about the Mustang, though.
…I don’t understand what you’re trying to say here. I know what all of these are.
The only thing in your list that’s accurate as “shit[ting] all over their own prestige they’ve built” for “the last several years now” is putting the Mustang badge on an electric SUV.
“Lightning” is a brand new badge for Ford; its use is not shitting on anything. Everything else you’ve mentioned has been going on for literal decades and is the source of a fair amount of that prestige, or in the case of the Dodge Dart badge being used on an economy car … that’s what the old Darts already were.
Nothing you said is accurate. You must never have seen the Fast and Furious or you would know there was a Lightning in the 90s. It is not new.
Other brands started shitting on their own branding in the late 00s, early 10s.
Fair on the 1990s Lightning, and no, I don’t get my automotive history from bad movies.
Cadillac shat on its branding in the 80s with the Cimarron. Mercedes did a bad job with the ML320 in the late 80s. Ford’s malaise era Thunderbird was extra malaisey. BMW has always been kind of hit or miss, they’ve always tried to be closer to the bleeding edge of technology, and that doesn’t always work out. Chrsyler K cars were so famously disposable that you can’t even find them anymore, but none of their cars have really been super reliable since the 70s.
My point still stands. Your understanding of automotive history is bad, and you should feel bad.
Was there a Cimarron V I’m unaware of? ML320 AMG? I’m still not sure what you’re trying to say but whatever it is you’re being an unnecessary giant dick about it so you can get fucked and blocked. You don’t know what you’re talking about.
I mean to say that all these manufacturers have “shit on their prestige” many times, way before you were born.
And it’s not an airport, you don’t need to announce your departure.