RegularJoe@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 1 month agoIf A.I. is so fast and efficient, and CEOs are paid so much, why not replace CEOs with A.I.?message-squaremessage-square68fedilinkarrow-up1460arrow-down114
arrow-up1446arrow-down1message-squareIf A.I. is so fast and efficient, and CEOs are paid so much, why not replace CEOs with A.I.?RegularJoe@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square68fedilink
minus-squarezxqwas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up28arrow-down1·1 month agoYou would not want to use AI anywhere it matters. Only in places where it does not matter if you get it right the first, second or even the third time, like customer support.
minus-squareStrider@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down2·1 month agoWe’re going inception style now, but then ceo would be even more fitting, don’t you think?
minus-squareCompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·1 month agoIt doesn’t matter, so … the CEO is perfect application!
You would not want to use AI anywhere it matters. Only in places where it does not matter if you get it right the first, second or even the third time, like customer support.
We’re going inception style now, but then ceo would be even more fitting, don’t you think?
It doesn’t matter, so … the CEO is perfect application!