RegularJoe@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 1 day agoIf A.I. is so fast and efficient, and CEOs are paid so much, why not replace CEOs with A.I.?message-squaremessage-square63fedilinkarrow-up1435arrow-down114
arrow-up1421arrow-down1message-squareIf A.I. is so fast and efficient, and CEOs are paid so much, why not replace CEOs with A.I.?RegularJoe@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square63fedilink
minus-squarezxqwas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up28arrow-down1·1 day agoYou would not want to use AI anywhere it matters. Only in places where it does not matter if you get it right the first, second or even the third time, like customer support.
minus-squareStrider@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down2·1 day agoWe’re going inception style now, but then ceo would be even more fitting, don’t you think?
minus-squareCompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·1 day agoIt doesn’t matter, so … the CEO is perfect application!
You would not want to use AI anywhere it matters. Only in places where it does not matter if you get it right the first, second or even the third time, like customer support.
We’re going inception style now, but then ceo would be even more fitting, don’t you think?
It doesn’t matter, so … the CEO is perfect application!