Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to RPGMemes @ttrpg.network · 2 days agoFlirting in the Forgotten Realmslemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up1218arrow-down113file-text
arrow-up1205arrow-down1imageFlirting in the Forgotten Realmslemmy.dbzer0.comStamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to RPGMemes @ttrpg.network · 2 days agomessage-square11fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareEmoPolarbear@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up49·1 day agoUmm actually… Those are pathfinder iconics, that’s flirting in Golarion baby.
minus-squareZagorath@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 day agoOh that’s good, because I was gonna say, tieflings don’t have prehensile tails in the Realms.
minus-squareArchpawn@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1 day agoI didn’t realize they did in Pathfinder. Neat.
minus-squarethreelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·23 hours ago and you can’t use it to hold items Aw…
minus-squareZagorath@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·1 day agoLooks like the followup ancestry feat is more applicable to this image. I do like the idea of it costing an ancestry feat to get though. Implies it’s a feature some nephilim have, but not the majority.
minus-squareArchpawn@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·17 hours agoBut is that really worth two feats? It seems like such a niche use case.
Umm actually… Those are pathfinder iconics, that’s flirting in Golarion baby.
Oh that’s good, because I was gonna say, tieflings don’t have prehensile tails in the Realms.
I didn’t realize they did in Pathfinder. Neat.
Aw…
Looks like the followup ancestry feat is more applicable to this image. I do like the idea of it costing an ancestry feat to get though. Implies it’s a feature some nephilim have, but not the majority.
But is that really worth two feats? It seems like such a niche use case.
deleted by creator