I cancelled too! I really wanna see what excuse Microsoft will pull out to walk back the changes.

Hit 'em where it hurts, people.

  • OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 minutes ago

    Just cancelled mine. I have barely been doing ~2 games per year, and the cost was low enough for me to not really care about the months I didn’t play at all.

    But a price increase is the straw.

  • Chris Lowles@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I wasn’t one of the unsubscribers here but I still can’t believe I stuck out on GP for so long back when I did unsub

  • Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Pro financial tip: Be a patient gamer. Get the games you are interested in during sales. Fuck FOMO, subscription models and pre-orders.

    • Guitarfun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Lately, I’ve only been buying indie games. I can’t justify dropping $70-$80 on one game and even when those games go on sale they’re usually $40-$50.

      If you read reviews and do a little research you’ll find that there are actually a lot of really cool indie games and you can get multiple games for just a fraction of the cost of double or triple A games.

    • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah, I’ve got so many more games than I have time to play them that there’s never a need to play full price for anything. I wishlist em and pick them up when they’re on sale less than £10

  • Glide@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    You know, fundamentally, I don’t hate Gamepass as a concept. “Netflix, but for videogames” is an idea I can get behind, as it widens the audience for something I love by lowering the bar of entry. There are plenty of people out there that benefit from being able to play a few games here and there without needing to commit hundreds of hours to $100 purchases.

    But Netflix has overstepped with price hikes and ads, and I’ve cancelled my service with them. That Microsoft thinks it can charge some ~$40CAD a month is pure hubris. I hope they learn quickly that, at that price point, the enthusiast market will happily cancel and just buy their games outright, and the casual market will decide it’s an expense they don’t need.

    • caseofthematts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      I get the inherent value people attach to it, but after having it several times (I’d have it for a month or two and then drop it for like, a year), I would never go back to it even if it still seemed like a good deal.

      For an app developed by Microsoft and working on a PC, it has some awful pathing, and I lost saves and had issues launching games on multiple occasions. Tried many fixes and it never worked out. Some games would work for me, others wouldn’t. So for me, since it felt like a toss up to get a game to work, it was pointless.

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I canceled. I don’t want the features they added. I don’t even use all the features they charge me for now. I just want to be able to try out so new games every so often. I’ll take the $30 I save and buy those same games, probably with some money leftover

    • whereyaaat@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      8 hours ago

      You should start using your brain instead of your wallet and begin torrenting.

      For all the money you’ve wasted renting games with gamepass, you could’ve been owning them with a fraction of the cost of a VPN.

      • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I understand, but I do want to support devs, especially indie devs, when u can. That’s why I have no qualms about canceling an expensive service and putting that money directly in their hands when it’s possible

  • calliope@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I really appreciate this, you just saved me at least $20.

    Microsoft’s user experience is awful at every step in a browser. I wanted to like XBox but it’s clear why they’re losing.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    The thing about this shit is…

    Microsoft, like Google, is now a user-data driven company and they have already made loss/profit ratio analysis on this long before they released the price increase. They’re absolutely banking on people cancelling but making up the difference and then some from the people who stay.

    For a thought experiment let’s consider how many subscribers they were reported to have in Feburary: 34 million. Let’s assume that everyone is paying for the highest tier to make the math easier. So current income would be 34 million user x $20 a month and thats $680 million a month. New income of 34 million users x $30 a month is $1.02 billion. The difference is $340 million a month. Let’s divide that by $30 a month. That gets us about 11,333,333 users. So they can hemorrhage over 11 million users and still break even. To make sure, let’s subtract 11 million users. That gives us 23 million users. 23 million users x $30 a month is $690 million a month, a cool $10 million a month above current profits.

    For final context, 11 million users is roughly 32% of their entire subscriber count. They can afford to lose a third of the people subscribing and still make money.

    The math doesn’t bode well for us who vote with our wallets.

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 hours ago

      And it gets even better. Instead of up to 33% leaving, say 50% of that group convert to Premium instead of Ultimate. That isn’t any lost revenue since the price is going up to what Ultimate used to be. So that cushions their numbers even more.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Now factor in the cost savings from a lower server load and less staff to run the back end, and possibly the smaller licensing\use costs for the games available to play since less people would be accessing those games.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 minutes ago

        But also less new users and still the usual churn of existing users. It could be a downward spiral.

    • quackerjo@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I’m not a licensed math surgeon, but I think your math is wildly optimistic in favor of Microsoft due to how the subscription totals are actually distributed per price tier.

      I don’t doubt that they did a lot of math to figure out an acceptable level of churn for this change, I just don’t think it’s nearly as generous and wide as you’re calculating.

      There probably is a very real churn limit that they’re trying to avoid, and my hunch is that there exists a breaking point that could be hit with an aggressive and sustained boycott / cancellation spree, but again, I’m not a math surgeon so I could be wrong. That’s just my gut feeling.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      One could imagine that conveniently, Microsoft’s online support pages and the amount of support staff were designed to only handle hundreds of thousands of cancelations at a time.

  • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Between the cost of housing and the cost of food, and the fact wages aren’t that much better than they were 15 years ago - you’d think they would realize they are asking for the scraps people have left.

    I’ve always just bought games when they’re on a good sale, I’ve never had a game pass type thing. But maybe they just want to squeeze a bit more out of their most loyal customers and they’re accepting that it is a dying model.

    • Prox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Once upon a time, the idea with subscriptions like this was to have customers set it and forget it. Charge them a small/reasonable amount and they’ll keep giving you money forever. Giving people a reason to think about - or worse, evaluate the merits of - the monthly deposit they’re giving you used to be a sin for companies.

      But here we are, seeing the difference between “companies” and “corpos”.

      • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        …is the difference being publicly traded on the stock exchange? The only company I can think of that doesn’t fall under “corpo” is Valve, and it seems to mostly be because they don’t have to answer to shareholders.

  • RunJun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Just canceled my 4 year old subscription. Can’t wait to hear the complaints from my kid but Netflix is likely next.

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      The missus and I sat down about a year ago and tabulated up how much all of the various streaming subscriptions were costing us per year (it was close to $1,000 when including YouTube Premium).

      We cancelled every single one, and put that money towards building a home NAS and filling that up with downloaded media. No more ads, stupidly low bitrates, or TV shows & movies disappearing because a license expired.

      The server has more than paid for itself at this point, and every additional spare dollar is being put aside for our kids’ tuition.

      ETA: Consider doing the same, your kid’ll likely thank you in the long run!

      PS: Never too late to introduce them to all of your favourite classic games, either - though that one may be a bit harder to get them onboard 🤣

      • RunJun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I have a 16TB server and an extensive steam collection. I already explained it to him and he was fine about it.

        • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Even better! What are you running on your server?

          Ours is just an old QNAP I dug out of storage with 4x8TB drives in RAID5 - but am eager to try out HexOS on a proper system once I have some spare time.

  • doctortofu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The price increase is absurd. I cancelled too, because while I do play quite a bit, this level of corporate greed is completely unjustifiable to me. If rather watch playthroughs of new games on Twitch or YouTube and then buy them a year later on sale than pay this bloody much, eff that.

    • M137@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Why watch playthroughs at all? Just wait till the games are on sale. And only a year isn’t that long, wait more and get better deals with more complete games. There’s nothing saying you need to hurry in any way, and several things saying it’s a good idea to wait. There are more than enough games available for anyone to not have to constantly claw at the newest releases in any way.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      To be fair it‘s as absurd as it was inevitable. Gamepass was always meant as this temporary thing you can try out to play some new games until everyone jumps ship because of increased prices. It has been preached for years. No one could‘ve seriously thought this was a long term alternative to buying games or at least buying licenses to games on Steam. All online subscriptions are scams in the process.

    • whereyaaat@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Just so you know, they only thought you were stupid enough to pay more because you were stupid to enough to pay at all.

      Use your brain before your wallet. Start torrenting.

      Stop being average.

  • bblkargonaut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It’s nice they pulled this nonsense during a steam sale. Cancelled and picked up halo mcc and silksong.