I wrote in this post that I’m uncomfortaple to argue “genetical[ly] or genealogical[ly]” why people “belong” in some place or another. I think that’s ethno-nationalist reasoning and a “weapon of the enemy” reasoning applies. Even if it’s in favour of Palestinians.
But apparently, that’s “settler-colonialist apologism” for dessalines. Ethno-nationalism is ok if it’s targeting “the right” people, I guess. /s
I think the reasoning of the comment removal is bollocks. Just because I don’t want to argue why someone “belongs” someplace because of their genes, I’m not all of a sudden in favour of settler-colonialism.
You were right to call that trash out… these genetic clown discussions always end in one place lol
Funny how you got censored but person making the claims that would never fly in any other context did not. Not that i support censorship of either position. People should be able to discuss the issue freely.
Palestinians indigenous population to the land, I don’t understand why genetic vector of argument is being used here at all beyond being dilatory on purpose.
I got banned on ML for calling American Jewish billionaires supporting Israel. bc NOT ALL JEWS 🤡
ML censorship has an interesting angle to it.
Genetics provide information about a population indigeneity
ok… now take this logic to the next step…
Palestinians are descendants of the Canaanites and never left the land, so they had the right to reject settler-colonial projects whose intention was to colonize all the land.
It is true that Jews are also descendants of the Canaanites. The difference is that most Zionists were foreign Jews who had lost connection to the land by living elsewhere for centuries. Those Zionists had no valid justification to impose a state on people who had lived in historic Palestine for centuries.
Using genetics and ancestry against Zionists to expose their hypocrisy and illogical arguments is both valid and important.
Only two most steps to a genocide!