People who pay for conveniences in order to delegate their labor these days often confuse their class/caste privileges for a sign of maturity. What you’re confusing for a sign of maturity (people cooperating with you because you are competent/ respected) is actually capitalism replacing your social connections with money. You’ll notice that’s also how they trashed the rest of your society, if you take two minutes and think about it.
For what its worth, I agree with you.
You did qualify what you said: “often confuse”.
Not “always confuse”, you didn’t say what you said totally without qualification.
It indeed ‘is often’ the case that people confuse convenience with… some kind of false, or ultimately self defeating idea of social status.
By using qualifiers in your original statement, you made it clear that you are describing a broad or general trend, not an absolute black and white rule.
…
Judging by your use of ‘cash-pilled’, I am guessing you are younger than myself, and all the older farts in this thread talking about whether or not to oil up their own dipsticks, lol.
I would imagine what you are saying is much, much more generally true with people your age, younger… the simple stats bare out that as economy has gotten worse and worse, it has financialized much more, everything is a subscription, a micro loan, nothing is built to last but instead built to break or be thrown away, finding a job with better than subsistence wages is extremely difficult, almost none of you will ever own a house, or be able to climb any kind of social ladder.
This has produced the phenomenon of ‘luxury poverty’… saving up for things is pointless, so dive headlong into conspicuous consumerism.
AI is going to ‘do everything’, so why bother developing a hobby or a skill… why even bother learning anything, writing anything.
And then of course all the mass shootings, and climate change is going to burn down and flood the world… life is cheap, yolo, live fast, die hard, there is no future.
…
Sure, it can be rational to pay someone else to do something for you, if your own time is more valuable.
But, you are, I think, coming from a perspective where… no, most younger people’s time actually is not that valuable, and they are being foolish in paying a premium for convenience, when their wages are usually so low that the straight math of the equation doesn’t work out …
… and they are also robbing themselves of experiences and opportunities to actually develop useful skills… and those experiences, they could actually be an antidote to the mindless narcissistic nilhism engendered by never having to do anything ‘real’.
…
So maybe that is a bit of the disconnect here, which you are trying to get at via mentioning classism:
You have trouble seeing that a person can work, still be working class, but it can also make sense for them to not do everything themself.
But others have trouble seeing the true extent of the … just, poverty, of the younger generation, which you identify as a meaningful dispsrarity of wealth.
…
I guess I wish I could have showed you the 90s.
We really were optimistic, broadly, back then.
Thought that things would get better, the internet and computers would usher in ‘The End of History’, a somewhat bumpy but predictable ride toward a near utopia.
We were very wrong.
But still, I wish you could have known some of that… awe, wonder, and hope.