Stamets@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 3 days agonot hard rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square373fedilinkarrow-up1454arrow-down113
arrow-up1441arrow-down1imagenot hard rulelemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square373fedilink
minus-squareSteve Dice@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoWater can’t absorb neither moisture nor water so it can’t be holding as much of either as can be absorbed.
minus-squareKombatWombat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·17 hours agoI would count a grouping of water as having absorbed itself personally. But either way, it technically can’t absorb any more water, so it is always at the absorption max, whether that’s 0% or 100% water.
minus-squareSteve Dice@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 hours agoI’m prepared to admit water is wet if you’re prepared to admit every non-absorbent material is perpetually wet since it can’t absorb any more water.
Water can’t absorb neither moisture nor water so it can’t be holding as much of either as can be absorbed.
I would count a grouping of water as having absorbed itself personally. But either way, it technically can’t absorb any more water, so it is always at the absorption max, whether that’s 0% or 100% water.
I’m prepared to admit water is wet if you’re prepared to admit every non-absorbent material is perpetually wet since it can’t absorb any more water.