Stamets@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 3 days agonot hard rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square374fedilinkarrow-up1456arrow-down113
arrow-up1443arrow-down1imagenot hard rulelemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square374fedilink
minus-squareKombatWombat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoI would count a grouping of water as having absorbed itself personally. But either way, it technically can’t absorb any more water, so it is always at the absorption max, whether that’s 0% or 100% water.
minus-squareSteve Dice@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·16 hours agoI’m prepared to admit water is wet if you’re prepared to admit every non-absorbent material is perpetually wet since it can’t absorb any more water.
minus-squareKombatWombat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 hours agoOk fair point on the 0%. I guess it does depend on whether you consider water to have absorbed itself or not for soaked.
I would count a grouping of water as having absorbed itself personally. But either way, it technically can’t absorb any more water, so it is always at the absorption max, whether that’s 0% or 100% water.
I’m prepared to admit water is wet if you’re prepared to admit every non-absorbent material is perpetually wet since it can’t absorb any more water.
Ok fair point on the 0%. I guess it does depend on whether you consider water to have absorbed itself or not for soaked.