• ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    then you should start saying things that are actually true? or not believing corporate propaganda at face value?

    • Quicky@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Have I said anything that’s untrue? Or am I just obliged to agree with you? You dismissed Clent’s comment because “Apple’s claims are irrelevant”, so even if they were doing exactly what they say, you wouldn’t accept it. There’s literally no point to this conversation beyond drawing out a disagreement where neither person can categorically be proven correct.

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        you claimed there is a lesser of two evils between stock apple and google phones, and implied throughout the conversation that apple is the better one. both claims are untrue.

        the other commenter you allude to claimed iphones are not closed source, which is really untrue.

        • Quicky@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          It’s not untrue, it’s that you believe it’s untrue.

          Unless of course you’re able to prove that Apple and Google are currently the same with respect to the data they harvest.

          • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            both systems are opaque. we have no reliable way of knowing beyond the encrypted data we see coming out of them, and both do it very similarly. hence both are the same, as far as an objective observer can tell.

            which is why your claim that its better is untrue. it’s about your beliefs, because you can’t really point to anything significant that apple does better for privacy, else you would have mentioned it.

            • Quicky@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              It doesn’t exist because I haven’t mentioned it? 😂

              I’m not here to do your research for you.

              • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 days ago

                so, you don’t actually have any facts to defend your untruthful claims?

                i mean of course you don’t. as i mentioned both systems are opaque.

                • Quicky@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 days ago

                  😂 by the very nature of your own point regarding their opacity, you can’t defend your claim that what I’ve said is untrue.

                  You can’t say “we don’t know, so you’re wrong”.

                  Well, maybe you can, but as I say, you have to be obtuse to do it.

                  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 days ago

                    no, i did not in fact say this, talk about being obtuse.

                    you don’t actually know of any fact at all to support your claims do you?

                    heading out, have a nice day. 😘