This is absolutely fetishizing. It’s applying a sexual aspect to the injection of E.
There is absolutely nothing sexual in this image. The artist’s submission is rated General. There are no genitals or breasts exposed and there isn’t the slightest hint of anything suggestive.
You would say there is nothing sexual about the image here? Portraying two anthropomorphic dogs in their underwear. Implying a relationship between them with the collars on the wall and implied top/bottom roles?
Being in underwear is not inherently sexual. Relationships are not inherently sexual, and sexual relationships are not constantly engaging in sexual activity. Collars on the wall of a bedroom of canine characters is not inherently sexual, and I genuinely don’t agree with you that there is anything that suggests top/bottom roles.
The artist also does NSFW art, so they actively fetishize these characters.
This is not one of those pieces of art, so you are just spouting complete nonsense.
Again, apply this concept to diabetics. What about diabetics who can’t afford to buy all the insulin they need? For example, do you think a poor diabetic should be discouraged from taking expired or improperly stored insulin when their only alternative option is not taking any insulin at all? (example I found in this study)
What I’m getting at here is that hormone therapy is a medical treatment that can and does save lives and improves quality of life - not just for trans people either. And in this current era of transphobic fascism, I think it’s kinda fucked up to imply to, say, trans folks in red states that may be banning HRT this sort of “oh well, if you can’t get your life-saving medication through the proper channels, you should just go without” idea.
At least, that’s how my perspective as a cis dude is interpreting what you’re saying in the context of the world right now.
absolutely nothing in this image suggests illegal drug use.
and even if it is illegal, so fucking what? it shouldn’t be, and nobody should obey or respect unjust laws.
I wonder, would you say the same thing about someone helping a diabetic with their insulin injections?
Removed by mod
This isn’t fetishizing it.
Removed by mod
What the complete and actual fuck?
There is absolutely nothing sexual in this image. The artist’s submission is rated General. There are no genitals or breasts exposed and there isn’t the slightest hint of anything suggestive.
Being in underwear is not inherently sexual. Relationships are not inherently sexual, and sexual relationships are not constantly engaging in sexual activity. Collars on the wall of a bedroom of canine characters is not inherently sexual, and I genuinely don’t agree with you that there is anything that suggests top/bottom roles.
This is not one of those pieces of art, so you are just spouting complete nonsense.
Again, apply this concept to diabetics. What about diabetics who can’t afford to buy all the insulin they need? For example, do you think a poor diabetic should be discouraged from taking expired or improperly stored insulin when their only alternative option is not taking any insulin at all? (example I found in this study)
What I’m getting at here is that hormone therapy is a medical treatment that can and does save lives and improves quality of life - not just for trans people either. And in this current era of transphobic fascism, I think it’s kinda fucked up to imply to, say, trans folks in red states that may be banning HRT this sort of “oh well, if you can’t get your life-saving medication through the proper channels, you should just go without” idea.
At least, that’s how my perspective as a cis dude is interpreting what you’re saying in the context of the world right now.
Removed by mod