This is absolutely fetishizing. It’s applying a sexual aspect to the injection of E.
There is absolutely nothing sexual in this image. The artist’s submission is rated General. There are no genitals or breasts exposed and there isn’t the slightest hint of anything suggestive.
You would say there is nothing sexual about the image here? Portraying two anthropomorphic dogs in their underwear. Implying a relationship between them with the collars on the wall and implied top/bottom roles?
Being in underwear is not inherently sexual. Relationships are not inherently sexual, and sexual relationships are not constantly engaging in sexual activity. Collars on the wall of a bedroom of canine characters is not inherently sexual, and I genuinely don’t agree with you that there is anything that suggests top/bottom roles.
The artist also does NSFW art, so they actively fetishize these characters.
This is not one of those pieces of art, so you are just spouting complete nonsense.
What the complete and actual fuck?
There is absolutely nothing sexual in this image. The artist’s submission is rated General. There are no genitals or breasts exposed and there isn’t the slightest hint of anything suggestive.
Being in underwear is not inherently sexual. Relationships are not inherently sexual, and sexual relationships are not constantly engaging in sexual activity. Collars on the wall of a bedroom of canine characters is not inherently sexual, and I genuinely don’t agree with you that there is anything that suggests top/bottom roles.
This is not one of those pieces of art, so you are just spouting complete nonsense.