“White and Smith (in press) surveyed three cohorts of men across 4 years of college. By the end of the study, 14% had reported committing attempted or completed rape and 34% had reported at least one act of sexual assault perpetration.”
"Almost a quarter (24.5%) of these men acknowledged committing an act since the age of 14 that met standard legal definitions of attempted or completed rape; an additional 39% had committed another type of sexual assault involving forced sexual contact or verbal coercion. "
Sorry, just a mistake i used to make a lot; citing sources has never convinced anyone. Closest ive ever seen work is exaggerating a number slightly so they correct you with the real-but-still-very-bad number,
They still don’t give a shit, but they do acknowledge it if you can get them to do that.
You would rather win the argument with one person than serve more people the source to read for themselves? If you quote a paper it should be sourced. If you don’t source it then it is suspicious and you are just creating conflict. Methods are important.
You don’t realize how insane that is to say, because you’re either not conscious or have no connection to material reality.
would rather win the argumet than
But then they cite it, which also saves me formatting a link.
read it for themselves
The point is that nobody gives a shit and facts to not persuade. They sre not ammunition. Materialists are unicorns. You aren’t one because
creating conflict
Says the rape apologist in the thread full of men saying rapists aren’t real and they would totally know if they saw one in spite of all the other people, including OP, pointing out how thats bullshit, including this one beautiful quixotic fool citing a source and bring told ‘nuh uh’ while they’re downvoted to oblivion even when we cite academic studies to back our experiences.
Says the the person who actually advocated not citing sources. People do care, it’s just you like to be right and because reality does not agree with your perceived bias, you can’t find any scientific source to back it up, and therefore cannot source one. Your pettiness is your problem, not ours.
Do you have a source for the number because it seems entirely made up.
“White and Smith (in press) surveyed three cohorts of men across 4 years of college. By the end of the study, 14% had reported committing attempted or completed rape and 34% had reported at least one act of sexual assault perpetration.”
"Almost a quarter (24.5%) of these men acknowledged committing an act since the age of 14 that met standard legal definitions of attempted or completed rape; an additional 39% had committed another type of sexual assault involving forced sexual contact or verbal coercion. "
And the link to that study is where?
You got enough information to look it up on scihub if you were actually interested.
I see so you are refusing to provide a link to a study despite the fact that it would so easily prove you right and everyone else wrong.
Seems like maybe the study doesn’t actually exist?
It is multiple studies, two different quotes.
Don’t cite sources. This isn’t about truth. Men’s feefees don’t care about facts and shit.
Oh yeah, I guessed that. Thanks.
Sorry, just a mistake i used to make a lot; citing sources has never convinced anyone. Closest ive ever seen work is exaggerating a number slightly so they correct you with the real-but-still-very-bad number,
They still don’t give a shit, but they do acknowledge it if you can get them to do that.
You would rather win the argument with one person than serve more people the source to read for themselves? If you quote a paper it should be sourced. If you don’t source it then it is suspicious and you are just creating conflict. Methods are important.
You don’t realize how insane that is to say, because you’re either not conscious or have no connection to material reality.
But then they cite it, which also saves me formatting a link.
The point is that nobody gives a shit and facts to not persuade. They sre not ammunition. Materialists are unicorns. You aren’t one because
Says the rape apologist in the thread full of men saying rapists aren’t real and they would totally know if they saw one in spite of all the other people, including OP, pointing out how thats bullshit, including this one beautiful quixotic fool citing a source and bring told ‘nuh uh’ while they’re downvoted to oblivion even when we cite academic studies to back our experiences.
Says the the person who actually advocated not citing sources. People do care, it’s just you like to be right and because reality does not agree with your perceived bias, you can’t find any scientific source to back it up, and therefore cannot source one. Your pettiness is your problem, not ours.