Sorry, just a mistake i used to make a lot; citing sources has never convinced anyone. Closest ive ever seen work is exaggerating a number slightly so they correct you with the real-but-still-very-bad number,
They still don’t give a shit, but they do acknowledge it if you can get them to do that.
You would rather win the argument with one person than serve more people the source to read for themselves? If you quote a paper it should be sourced. If you don’t source it then it is suspicious and you are just creating conflict. Methods are important.
You don’t realize how insane that is to say, because you’re either not conscious or have no connection to material reality.
would rather win the argumet than
But then they cite it, which also saves me formatting a link.
read it for themselves
The point is that nobody gives a shit and facts to not persuade. They sre not ammunition. Materialists are unicorns. You aren’t one because
creating conflict
Says the rape apologist in the thread full of men saying rapists aren’t real and they would totally know if they saw one in spite of all the other people, including OP, pointing out how thats bullshit, including this one beautiful quixotic fool citing a source and bring told ‘nuh uh’ while they’re downvoted to oblivion even when we cite academic studies to back our experiences.
Says the the person who actually advocated not citing sources. People do care, it’s just you like to be right and because reality does not agree with your perceived bias, you can’t find any scientific source to back it up, and therefore cannot source one. Your pettiness is your problem, not ours.
Sorry, just a mistake i used to make a lot; citing sources has never convinced anyone. Closest ive ever seen work is exaggerating a number slightly so they correct you with the real-but-still-very-bad number,
They still don’t give a shit, but they do acknowledge it if you can get them to do that.
You would rather win the argument with one person than serve more people the source to read for themselves? If you quote a paper it should be sourced. If you don’t source it then it is suspicious and you are just creating conflict. Methods are important.
You don’t realize how insane that is to say, because you’re either not conscious or have no connection to material reality.
But then they cite it, which also saves me formatting a link.
The point is that nobody gives a shit and facts to not persuade. They sre not ammunition. Materialists are unicorns. You aren’t one because
Says the rape apologist in the thread full of men saying rapists aren’t real and they would totally know if they saw one in spite of all the other people, including OP, pointing out how thats bullshit, including this one beautiful quixotic fool citing a source and bring told ‘nuh uh’ while they’re downvoted to oblivion even when we cite academic studies to back our experiences.
Says the the person who actually advocated not citing sources. People do care, it’s just you like to be right and because reality does not agree with your perceived bias, you can’t find any scientific source to back it up, and therefore cannot source one. Your pettiness is your problem, not ours.