• Jankatarch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Yeah it’s a “implies” relation not “if and only if.” The mathematical outcomes are.

        Possible:

        • Someone answers elephant and they do it.
        • Someone doesn’t answer elephant and they do it.
        • Someone doesn’t answer and they don’t do it.

        Impossible:

        • Someone answers elephant and they don’t do it.

        Truth validity list shows you did kinda guarantee their fate tho.

        • tetris11@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          only in classical, if we go quantum all kinds of meanings can take place:

          • Someone answers <elephant|giraffe> and they do it
          • Someone answers elephant and they <do|don’t> do it

          Possible:

          • Someone answers “don’t do it” and the elephant does it
      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        If it did it prior to seeing the picture of the 🐘 I would have struggled to remember what it was called. My word association always sucked if I smoked. I would have just sat their laughing with someone else both trying to guess half the names on the list here.

        Mouse and squirrel would have definitely come up.

        Though it effects everyone differently. My perception sucks compared when doing other things. If someone asked me to play darts while high I would probably miss the board so id just say no, while others would do great.