Operated from 1972 to 1996 and produced 119 billion kilowatt hours of energy

Dry cask storage is a method for safely storing spent nuclear fuel after it has cooled for several years in water pools. Once the fuel rods are no longer producing extreme heat, they are sealed inside massive steel and concrete casks that provide both radiation shielding and passive cooling through natural air circulation—no water is needed. Each cask can weigh over 100 tons and is engineered to resist earthquakes, floods, fire, and even missile strikes. This makes it a robust interim solution until permanent deep geological repositories are available. The casks are expected to last 50–100 years, though the fuel inside remains radioactive for thousands. Dry cask storage reduces reliance on crowded spent fuel pools, provides a secure above-ground option, and buys time for nations to develop long-term disposal strategies. In essence, it’s a durable, self-contained “vault” for nuclear waste

  • Derpenheim@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    This post is incorrect, and harmful. Casks do not only last for up to 100 years. They are given a 20 year certificate, and a renewable 40 year certificate inperpetuity pending safety inspection of the casket.

    Related

    • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      That’s similar to what’s done with a lot of mine wastes, which are just as harmful, if not more.

      Millions of tonnes of metal-rich tailings are held back at a given mine by their engineered dams. The only thing stopping a ‘tee hee whoops’ is routine inspection and maintenance, even in post-closure

      • Derpenheim@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 days ago

        It is not at all similar. Those mines were just sealed off from the outside world with the dangerous materials therein left to polluted surrounding ground waters. These are stand alone and separated containers meant to hold these wastes indefinitely, until such time as their half lives render them no longer a threat.

        • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 days ago

          You’re thinking abandoned mines. Closed mines are different, and the difference is big. With closed mines the objective is to return the land to its preexisting land use or one that supports something else equally as valuable.

          To do that, wastes are managed in a variety of ways. Usually the biggest issues are related to water quality and preventing contamination. Landscapes are re-established and reclaimed. It’s not just dust your hands and walk away like it used to be.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Edit: sorry, I thought you were arguing they dontast that long. My brain skipped the “only” at the beginning.

      The image you linked literally says they last 100+ years. Sure, they need to be checked on to make sure nothing is going wrong, but when is that not the case with hazardous material storage?