• MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      When it’s a good writer writing them and not a transphobic moron, then they make perfect sense.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          I’m not certain of any specific usages of the word that predate Harry, but the general concept of a spirit vessel that saves mortality is not terribly new nor unique. Generally speaking, a spirit needs to have all connections with a mortal plane severed in order to move on. A spirit vessel like a horcrux is merely a separate attachment to ‘this’ world that can be separated and protected. Having more than one is also not terribly unique.

          If Dipshit Transphobe were anywhere near a good writer, this could’ve been a big point as to why Voldyboi was an idiot for doing it, because it’d basically be cursing himself to have a near permanent connection to the mortal plane, especially with how scattered he made his crap, making his existence torture on the best of days… like a lich posessing objects, it shouldn’t be easy nor kind to the user.

          Though since she’s an utterly shit writer, it only amounted to, “oh boy, he’s hard to permanently kill!”.

          • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Right. The vague concept existed before in many different forms. She put hircruxes in her books and made them a thing that people understood. I’m not saying she’s a great writer, but she clearly appealed to a lot of people with her writing, and not just kids. Her stories at least had decent morals. I’m not defending any of her anti-trans crap, but her Harry Potter fiction is a separate thing.

            • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Ehhhhh, the morals are a mixed bag beyond what the main characters attempt to exemplify. The world itself is rife with bigotry and BS. Muggles? A slang word for inferior people? Banker goblins that stick to many Jewish stereotypes? Enslaved house elves totally accepted as normal by society? It only gets worse the deeper you go.

              • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Isn’t that the point tho? The author created a purposefully imperfect world where the children could recognize the injustices and stand up against them. That’s role modeling the right behavior. Our world is certainly not perfect and we have to stand up against bigotry and injustice (like transphobia). And the heros in the hp stories make mistakes but they learn and improve themselves - Rowling could learn from her own books!

                • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  26 minutes ago

                  The heros? Sure I guess. Though the story archs JK writes were absolutely not about that. They were far, far inferior to what we wish they were.