Have you noticed the rush of House Republicans calling it quits in the last few weeks?

Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.) announced his exit Nov. 1. He explained that to be a member of the Republican House majority means putting up with  the “many Republican leaders [who] are lying to America, claiming that the 2020 election was stolen.”

Buck is predicting that even more House Republicans will leave “in the near future.”

The day before Buck said good-bye, House Appropriations Chair Kay Granger (R-Texas) also quit. Granger had been a leader among House Republicans who prevented the far-right, election-denying Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) from becoming Speaker of the House.

Also in October, Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.) said she was quitting. “Right now, Washington, D.C. is broken,” she said. “It is hard to get anything done.”

  • Cylusthevirus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Weird, I feel like “both sides” rhetoric is delusional and anyone spouting it at this point is covering for fascist garbage.

    Democrats have a corporate tit sucking problem and aren’t doing enough. Republicans are trying to burn down the planet by doing the opposite of whatever knowledgeable people tell them should be done. These two groups are not the same, OBVIOUSLY.

    Every group has problems, Democrats are not angels. This is not news to anyone. “Ackthually, both sides” isn’t a well considered rhetorical position, it’s a suicide note.

    • twisted28@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Just as with the Israel/Hamas conflict, there is something called nuance. We can criticize the Democratic Party without being Anti-Democrat.

      • Cylusthevirus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        The post I replied to was not a well reasoned critique of the Democratic party; it was a false equivalency. Mine, however, did contain a fairly specific critique of Democrats. I have adopted the nuance you mentioned. The question is why you’re choosing to ignore that.

        • twisted28@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Their critiques are valid and reasonable. Your attempt to shame them into silence is not

    • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The whole system is broken, though. Just because one is worse doesn’t mean the other is perfect.

      • Cylusthevirus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        “The whole system is broken” is so nebulous a critique as to be meaningless. The system exhibits specific problems for which there are certain rememdies. The reasons for the lack of attempt for these remedies range from corruption to lack of political will.

        If what you’re actually saying is “we need to burn it all down and start over” please kindly say so and you’re welcome to go on my block list with all the other Saturday Morning Cartoon Revolutionaries without the faintest conception of the vast ocean of suffering you would unleash on your countrymen.

        • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It is nebulous, but I’m the one that phrased it as system. The comment you replied to listed parts of the system specifically that they felt were problematic and applied to both parties. It’s by no means them saying both sides are the same, though.

          Meh. I’m a gradualist. I think there are ways to incrementally improve the world that aren’t impossible to implement.