You gotta be dumb to buy in
AI recording wearables are quietly listening to everyone in Silicon Valley
Well, Silicon Valley is in California, and California is a two-party consent state, so if they have the things recording when they’re on a phone call or videoconference without first getting the other people there to all okay it, they’re breaking the law.
reads further
The rules around recording permission differ by state. California’s wiretapping law requires everyone in a confidential conversation to give explicit consent before being recorded in situations where there’s a “reasonable expectation of privacy.”
“You could potentially be subject to criminal penalties if you record a conversation and all parties haven’t consented,” said Catherine Crump, a technology law expert at UC Berkeley.
Yup.
Those building AI recording devices hope there’s a gray area. Patel said his Buddi device transcribes but does not record audio for that exact reason.
I guess that will be an interesting court case when it finally comes up.
Good luck filing. You’re already fucked
Orwell was right
He wrote 1984 as a warning and some took it as instructions.
qUiEtLy listening
so… listening? this “qUiETLy” buzzword needs to fucking die“Deceptively”
It’s not even that. It needs to listen to function, and people want to vocally operate their devices. It cannot do one without doing the other.
We all have phones…
(and everywhere else)
