Yes, I’m aware I can curse on the internet - it’s not my first day here. I use the exact words I mean to use, and I’m more a fan of the precision F-strike than indiscriminately carpet-bombing the place with “fucks”. Stop word-policing me (and others).

Edited to add alt text.

Yeah, this went over about as well as expected. And the irony and hypocrisy of the free speech absolutists coming out of the woodwork to tell us all what we can and can’t say is not lost on me.

  • Iced Raktajino@startrek.websiteOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    71
    ·
    2 days ago

    The reasoning is irrelevant. Those are the words the person is choosing to use, and no one is in any way negatively affected by it.

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean, I’m not policing your words here, write how you want what do I care.

      But you brought up the reasoning yourself, and when I find it flawed your response is “I don’t need a reason”.

      • Ech@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        2 days ago

        But you brought up the reasoning yourself

        Where? Their whole post is just “let people say what they want to say”. You’re the one trying to force them to justify it or fit your weird rubric.

        • Lumidaub@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          They did say they’re in favour of not “carpet bombing f-bombs” which does sound like they’d prefer less vulgarity and they censor any curse word in order to achieve that. see censoring curse words as a way to achieve that.

          Edit: clarity

          • Ech@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            Stating their personal preference isn’t a “reasoning”. Do you also think someone that wears a blue shirt is “reasoning” that everyone should wear blue shirts forever?

            • Lumidaub@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              They mentioned their preference in context of their thesis (“it’s perfectly fine to censor curse words”) so I can’t help but understand it as meant to support that thesis.

              • angrystego@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                I think it was more of an example of why someone would want to use censored curses without it having any wierd reasoning like religion or something. Just an illustration that censored curses are not necessarily evil. That’s an important context. But it’s just context, not the basis of the point. The point was: don’t tell people what words they should use, it’s not your business.

                • Lumidaub@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  And the reaction to that was “it doesn’t work like how you think it works”.

    • Vespair@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Look man, you can say potato means underwear all you want, but if you start saying you’re wearing potato under your pants people are going to look at you weird. You are not the only party involved in communication, and thus your preferences are only part of the equation, and people will interpret and process your words based on conventions, not just your personal thoughts on the matter.