• Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Owning class, working class and then you do have a mid point of worker/owner class. Their money comes partly from their labour but also partly from their wealth

    • Hazor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Those at the midpoint still have to work to live, so they are working class. 🤷

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        At some point it’s more that they want the extra money than they have to work, and they own so they are also the owning class

        • Hazor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          If they don’t have to work to live, they’re no longer working class (Musk still works at Tesla, but clearly doesn’t need to). But I’m not sure what your point is. Are you saying that those who derive their wealth from the labor of workers but who can’t afford a yacht should be treated differently than billionaires? I’m not arguing that we shouldn’t have progressive tax rates, I’m only saying that an arbitrarily defined ‘middle class’ exists solely so that you and I are distracted by exactly these discussions, and provides no benefit to determining what is justifiable economic policy.