PugJesus@lemmy.world to The Internet in Ancient Times@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoHey cavemen! Sharpen up your sticks!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square142fedilinkarrow-up1595arrow-down19
arrow-up1586arrow-down1imageHey cavemen! Sharpen up your sticks!lemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.world to The Internet in Ancient Times@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square142fedilink
minus-squarePrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down7·3 days agoNo one is saying that you’re just chucking a Gorilla and a Human/group of humans into a ring. if the human/humans know that they will be fighting a Gorilla then they can fashion weapons and strategies. A single human could easily kill a gorilla if they could choose the time and place of the engagement. It’s how we became the dominant species on the planet
minus-squareAlexanderTheDead@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·3 days agoThe premise is and has always been 100 unarmed humans (I think men, specifically). That is exactly what everyone has been saying the whole time. 100 unarmed humans in a ring with 1 gorilla.
minus-squarePrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·2 days agoI’ve not heard unarmed being specified. but that’s not how humans fight. You could start unarmed and then improvise a weapon
minus-squareAlexanderTheDead@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-22 days agoRight, I don’t know how you missed it, it’s been unarmed the whole time. It’s built into the premise of the original viral post. It’s a hypothetical. What you’re saying right now doesn’t matter. The hypothetical premise has always been “unarmed”. Look it up lol. Edit: i looked it up and cannot find the “original hypothetical premise” I claimed existed, so, fuck me. That being said… yeah. One man with a weapon bodies a gorilla. People are so fucking stupid.
minus-squareAlexanderTheDead@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoThink about how stupid the average person is, and then remember that about 50 of them are stupider than that! Hahah
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoSo the answer seems to be, “yes”? I’d agree seeing the trajectory of humanity…
minus-squareArchangel1313@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down7·3 days agoExactly. Weapons are required. Unarmed? Fuck, no.
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoHere. Watch someone who actually knows what the fuck they’re talking about explain it to you. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cFf6YowOm7o
minus-squareLilB0kChoy@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down7·2 days agoI don’t use YouTube and you’re taking a theoretical exercise very seriously. The reason people debate this question is because there is no definitive right answer. Maybe take a couple deep breaths and calm down.
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoOh so you’re just actively refusing to take in informed information on the matter… No wonder you believe stupid shit.
No one is saying that you’re just chucking a Gorilla and a Human/group of humans into a ring.
if the human/humans know that they will be fighting a Gorilla then they can fashion weapons and strategies.
A single human could easily kill a gorilla if they could choose the time and place of the engagement.
It’s how we became the dominant species on the planet
The premise is and has always been 100 unarmed humans (I think men, specifically).
That is exactly what everyone has been saying the whole time. 100 unarmed humans in a ring with 1 gorilla.
I’ve not heard
unarmedbeing specified. but that’s not how humans fight.You could start unarmed and then improvise a weapon
Right, I don’t know how you missed it, it’s been unarmed the whole time. It’s built into the premise of the original viral post.
It’s a hypothetical. What you’re saying right now doesn’t matter. The hypothetical premise has always been “unarmed”. Look it up lol.
Edit: i looked it up and cannot find the “original hypothetical premise” I claimed existed, so, fuck me.
That being said… yeah. One man with a weapon bodies a gorilla. People are so fucking stupid.
But are 100 men stupid? 🤔
Think about how stupid the average person is, and then remember that about 50 of them are stupider than that! Hahah
So the answer seems to be, “yes”? I’d agree seeing the trajectory of humanity…
Exactly. Weapons are required.
Unarmed? Fuck, no.
Here. Watch someone who actually knows what the fuck they’re talking about explain it to you. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cFf6YowOm7o
I don’t use YouTube and you’re taking a theoretical exercise very seriously. The reason people debate this question is because there is no definitive right answer.
Maybe take a couple deep breaths and calm down.
Oh so you’re just actively refusing to take in informed information on the matter… No wonder you believe stupid shit.