• piefood@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    As opposed to the Democratic leaders who chose Genocide over winning an easy election? The same leaders who were brilliantly telling voters to sit down and shut up, who made everything so much better, and doubtless learned a lot?

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The state of the American mind is such that they literally cannot conceive of an outcome that doesn’t massacre 450k people and counting.

      • yourebrainwashed@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I call it inherent suppremacism. They never considered foreigners as human, they solely comprehended gaza through the lense of their domestic politics. Still do: vylan is a british artisk afaik, blocked by the british governement, for his stance about a genocide that happens in the middle east.

        Still some american idiot WILL take that opportunity to spreas his admin-sanctionned denialist narrative according to which “no the genocide was unavoidable actually you are the scums for not voting for the genocider. Now i have to face my own medecine and it’s so bitter”

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      As opposed to the Democratic leaders who chose Genocide over winning an easy election?

      Is that what happened?

      • Milk_Sheikh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        As opposed to a fantasy, yes.

        Ah yes. Nothing is possible, we should accept the scraps that our rulers and industry leaders allow us and be grateful. “The orphan crushing machine is quite tolerable today, thank ye sire for only taking three children”.

        If Biden truly wanted to, he could have curbed Israel in 2023. And not even anything as bold as an immediate and complete arms embargo; there was a lot of US soft power that he and Harris refused to wield, and what was done was largely token optics like sanctioning settlers whilst shipping arms contrary to US regulations, or ‘pausing’ delivery of 2,000lb bombs whilst keeping the 500lb & 1,000lb bombs and artillery shells flowing.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          If Biden truly wanted to, he could have curbed Israel in 2023.

          Through what means and with what downside? “Because he said so” and “None / Who cares” aren’t options.

          You’re really sure though, so I’m interested to know.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 days ago

            Through what means and with what downside?

            He could have simply said that he wouldn’t be selling them weapons in accordance with the Leahy Law.

            Whose votes do you think he would lose? Centrists? I thought they were all about “no matter who.”