• s12@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you’re right, then this would mean that the people who don’t like immigrants would struggle more with getting people to their side, and thus be less likely to destroy the country.
    If you’re wrong, then it would mean that immigrants would be less likely to destroy the country.

    Either way, it will be more statistics that news sites and drama people will be able to spin to generate clicks.

    • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      The only problem with this idea is that it is designed to record sex crimes against children by non-wealthy, non-politically and -religiously connected, non-powerful, and non-white child sex predators. The wealthy child sex predators, the politically connected child sex predators, the religiously connected child sex predators, and the powerful child sex predators who are predominantly white and birthright citizens will continue to cover for each other or be moved from parish to parish to continue their child sex crimes as her have done for hundreds of years.

      • s12@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I would have thought it would be designed against that.
        Though the ultra wealthy and powerful would probably find a way around almost anything…

        • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I said that in a comment. It won’t catch the bulk of the abuse because it is perpetrated by wealthy, powerful, connected white people.