The vote in question was for an amendment and was a meaningless one that was never going to pass and get added to the bill.

The vote she showed is the bill that actually funded Israel and she voted against it. You are disingenuously claiming that a meaningless vote on a doomed amendment for a bill she wasn’t going to vote in favor of is the same thing as voting in favor of the bill.

She disagreed with other people about ingredients for a meal she refuses to eat and you’re pretending the ingredients argument disagreement was the same as eating the meal.