• smol_beans@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Do you have any red lines? Will you vote for a candidate that wants to murder your mom as long as the other candidate wants to murder both your parents?

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, PugJesus doesn’t. He would have been voted for Hitler himself, as Hitler’s whole shtick was that what he was doing was a necessary evil for the greater good of the German people. The road to Hell is paved with utilitarianism.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      That would necessary, yes. Voting doesn’t preclude working against the fucked system. It means if your plans to alter or overthrow the fucked system don’t go through in time, you get the less bad option of the choices presented.

      Voting takes a few moments of your time, not a lifetime dedication to the grind. Voting is a strategic maneuver, not a love letter.

      • smol_beans@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Would you yell at the people who refused to vote for killing your mom and tell them it’s their fault both your parents are dead now?

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          Abso-fucking-lutely I would, what kind of question is that? What kind of ghoul would choose to kill both of my parents? There were only two fucking options, it’s not rocket science. They would be 100% guilty of killing my father.

          • smol_beans@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            So we agree, you have no red lines. Every election is a political race to the bottom and everyone’s rights are negotiable.

            Only difference is you think that’s a good thing and I think it’s a bad thing.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              2 days ago

              I mean, if you thought that the general election was the only political action of note in a democracy, that would be true? But uh, those of us who participate in broader society, or even just bother to fucking show up to the primaries, know that by the time of the general election, much of the work to change positions is already finished, and all that’s actually left is the final clash between the coalitions which have been cobbled together by activists.

              • smol_beans@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Primaries? What primaries?

                But also, isn’t this meme you posted pretty ridiculous considering you admit that you would cast a vote to put trans people in camps if the situation was right?

                • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  The primaries that are held every two years to decide nominations for Dem candidates, wherein some marginal percentage of people show up and the ones that do are overwhelmingly crusty old centrist ghouls because young progressives, I suppose, think they have better things to do?